Justice Department Says CFPB Will Be Streamlined, Not Dismantled

Lawyers for the Justice Department have stated that the Trump Administration plans to streamline the CFPB rather than dismantle it according to court filings filed on 2/24. This is contradictory to statements that President Trump has previously made to reporters earlier this month (do you intend to totally eliminate the CFPB, “That was a very important thing to get rid of,”).

According to court filings a streamlined CFPB will continue to:

  • Continue to operate its call center and database for consumer complaints
  • Produce mortgage data
  • Require payments to consumers harmed by corporate misconduct

In early February CFPB was ordered to shut down and employees told to do no work. There were also reports that CFPB was no longer passing along consumer complaints to banks. As part of the streamlined CFPB less office space will be required, with the current lease being cancelled. Union officials have stated that they believe the agency plans to terminate most staff.

I think everybody can agree that regardless of the outcome that this could have been better handled with clearer communication on what changes were being made with no contradictory statements. It’s possible the Trump administration has seen the backlash and legal challenges and decided to make changes base on this. I welcome any change that continues the complaints handling, although it will be difficult to determine if enforcement action is still up to par for some time as these things are usually slow moving.

Please try to keep comments on topic, I suspect we will have to close them after the discussion runs it’s course.

 

194 Comments
newest
oldest most voted

Eric 🔗
Eric 🔗 (@guest_2014110)
February 28, 2025 19:26

This is like a soap opera. Every other day the story changes but it always end up back in the same place!

Frank the tank
Frank the tank (@guest_2013539)
February 27, 2025 22:26

It will take complaints, but will do nothing about them.

Davileet
Davileet (@guest_2013155)
February 27, 2025 09:06

Last time I used CFPB before Trump was elected, they were essentially already a toothless dog. “We collect cases and see if there is any action to be taken at a later time.”

Karl
Karl (@guest_2013429)
February 27, 2025 17:54

They were de-fanged during the first Trump administration but still far from harmless. The oppression of big banks continued so more streamlining was required.

I don’t remember Orwell using the word “streamline” but he would be impressed.

Jack
Jack (@guest_2013063)
February 26, 2025 23:43

The Abolition of Slavery/CFPB. or Abortion

Me Off
Me Off (@guest_2013213)
February 27, 2025 10:34

WTF are you talking about, son?!

Eric 🔗
Eric 🔗 (@guest_2013640)
February 28, 2025 06:00

Me Off,

1 person upvoted that comment from Jack so it made sense to them at least!

BrandonB
BrandonB (@guest_2013040)
February 26, 2025 22:56

Call your States Attorney – dont pretend there isnt help out there

Shills Kill
Shills Kill (@guest_2013216)
February 27, 2025 10:36

You miss the point, yet again. It’s not that there are no possible alternatives, it’s that the alternatives, like state attorneys general, are more difficult, and companies know that, so they will inevitably get away with more against us, the consumers.

Karl
Karl (@guest_2012987)
February 26, 2025 21:14

90% of CFPB employees are following orders to do nothing. Therefore they are redundant.

Most of the remaining 10% are gainfully employed preventing the others from interfering with the financial industry. But once the deadwood is cleaned out, they will also be redundant.

A simple algorithm will be capable of managing the honeypot and forwarding the blacklist to participating FIs. Once everything is running smoothly the CFPB can probably be streamlined to just 2-3 carefully vetted employees, greatly reducing the burden on taxpayers the financial sector.

randomguy
randomguy (@guest_2013162)
February 27, 2025 09:20

I have a crypto scheme that will make you millions. Its fully run by a simple algorithm. You get 90% return on your investment. There is only one vetted employee, me, so no overhead.

T_L
T_L (@guest_2012709)
February 26, 2025 14:33

Lol as a churner I push things hard enough that I wouldn’t be surprised if the banks turn the tables and send the CFPB after me!

Dream a little bigger, darling
Dream a little bigger, darling (@guest_2013218)
February 27, 2025 10:37

I like where your head is at. Always think of the worst case, then think harder and worser.

Eric 🔗
Eric 🔗 (@guest_2012696)
February 26, 2025 14:24

Did anyone else notice that Someone considering to forget this site.... requested that the entire DoC site be deleted here: #2012318 ?

Jack
Jack (@guest_2012751)
February 26, 2025 15:37

Sounds like Someone considering to forget this site.... needs a safe space. Just the sight of something “political” triggers them. What a snowflake! They could just ignore the posts. It’s not like bank/credit card bonus posts stopped getting posted. Lol

Carlzjr
Carlzjr (@guest_2012826)
February 26, 2025 17:24

Ooh I got a good name for this safe space: DJT of Credit! Already bought up the URL though. Scam on bros!

Kinky
Kinky (@guest_2013222)
February 27, 2025 10:38

That ‘Someone considering to forget this site….’ guy sounds like a CUCK, which is totally cool, because we don’t kink shame, and also because we respect free speech, and will call him out for being stupid.

Eric 🔗
Eric 🔗 (@guest_2013638)
February 28, 2025 05:58

How do you know that it’s a man? There are a lot of women that comment here also.

Retired
Retired (@guest_2012627)
February 26, 2025 13:02

Don’t forget this good one from CFPB — CFPB Sues Capital One Over Maintaining Two ‘360 High Yield Savings Accounts’ With Differing Rates

https://www.doctorofcredit.com/cfpb-sues-capital-one-over-maintaining-two-360-high-yield-savings-accounts-with-differing-rates/

sg77
sg77 (@guest_2012729)
February 26, 2025 14:58

These discussions always reach a point where I can’t even tell which side someone is arguing for.

Eric 🔗
Eric 🔗 (@guest_2012951)
February 26, 2025 20:11

I don’t know about you but I’m not for a certain “side”. I would just prefer that everyone state facts to back up their arguments no matter which side that they are on. Is that too much to ask for?