My Thoughts On The Aftermath Of The U.S. Mint Coin Deal

Update: I’ve decided to close the comments, I think at this stage people are just talking in circles and nothing new is really being said. In addition it looks like a few dedicated trolls are creating comments with different names to try and make it seem like a lot of people agree with their point of the view.

Last week we posted a deal where readers could purchase an American Eagle 2019 One Ounce Silver Enhanced Reverse Proof coin for $86.9 (including shipping) and lock in $113.10 profit by committing to sell it to PFS Coins if they were lucky enough to be able to purchase the coin. In that post we made it clear that readers should only opt into this deal if they were 100% committed to selling the coin to PFS if they were successful.

I normally don’t post coin deals as the vast majority of them are not money makers and I don’t want readers to lose money. In this case PFS was offering a guaranteed profit so agreed to post after checking with  with other coin purchasers to see if they would offer a better rate (none would at the time of posting). The coin itself sold out extremely quickly and prices quickly soared to $500+ on eBay, despite the fact that readers had committed to selling to PFS I saw a lot of comments from readers saying that they were no longer going to stick to this commitment due to the higher prices. A lot of readers were saying that PFS were being greedy by not increasing their offer after the fact.

I don’t think it’s fair to protect yourself from any downside by opting into the PFS deal and then selling to other sellers if the value increases. I think there is also a lot of misunderstanding about how PFS actually does business. This comment from Aron provides some insight:

Our business model follow this typical path – We pre-sell our EXPECTED orders to a dealer or two – we made great connections (over 13 years doing this, and work with the largest in the business – names that were mentioned in this thread, name you all know).
we do this for EVERY DEAL WE RUN. the last time PFS didn’t pre-sell our expected orders was in October of 2015 (JFK C&C sets). We have done >20 deals since. This is a fact.

Now, typically we give ~60% of the premium the we receive (over mint cost) to our members, we have about 20% of opex, and are lucky/extremely happy if we net 20% of what the total premium is.

The price and premium we get ALWAYS has to do with the pre-sale “value” of the item.

CASE IN POINT – this is our 4th deal we ran this year. We did the Apollo coins at the start of the year, The Pride Sets in July, and we just did the Palladium coin a bit ago. ALL THREE OF THOSE DEALS we received a premium, shared it liberally with our members, and they ALL – each one of the three – declined in value RIGHT AWAY – neither sold out at the Mint, and buyers (including ourselves and our dealers) were able to buy as many as they wanted 24 hours later directly from the mint.

We came through – to every buyer – there were between $700 and $1987 in spend (depending on which deal) there were commissions paid out, FedEx labels sent, emails answered, boxes packed etc.

PFS NEVER went and negotiated with our members, hey, cancel your order, or let me pay you less since they’re worth less, or let me buy the coins ourselves so we can get our own credit card points. never.

ALL OF A SUDDEN there’s a deal the works in the favor our OUR DEALERS – (for us – and our members – this was a guaranteed deal and this should be like each and every other deal – where we had the guarantee and we had the risless profit…) but no, now PFS is the villain!! PFS is preying on people that had no clue while they knew this was going to explode!

FACT: PFS sold our entire quantity – even more than we’ll likely end up getting – PRIOR to the “value” increasing.

Realistically, there are two items here, there’s the silver eagle on Wednesday the 13th – that we all had a price and a fair value for, and we were all were SO EXCITED about getting paid $100 for spending 20 minutes at lunch break the next day.

And now the item dwarfed into something so much bigger, everyone wants in on the upside! I don’t get it, I really don’t. You can’t invest in a guaranteed Bank CD at 2% interest and then call the Banker and ask for the 20% that the S&P 500 returned!!! This is precisely what’s going on.

We clearly warned about it to…
“*There are 30,000 of these coins being minted, and we do not want to hold any extra inventory for ourselves. It truly is impossible to know if they’ll be a good investment / speculation and if they don’t sell out, the Mint will likely lift the household limits 24 hours after they go on sale.
*You must be approved before making the purchase. If you do not receive a confirmation email to purchase you will not be reimbursed.
*On the same note, since we want to fill our entire purchase order and are not accepting extra opt-ins, if you do want to partake in this deal, please make sure that you will be available to make the purchase at exactly 12PM ET.
*We cannot afford to be a backstop for people wanting to speculate afterward. Any unfilled quantity we have, could have went to someone else that may not have been approved for the offer because of your spot. If you opt in – you must be fully committed to fulfill the deal.”

If the opposite happened and coin prices had dropped, I have no doubt PFS would have kept their end of the bargain (as they have in the past). I think it’s disappointing that some readers decided not to honor their side of the deal after the fact. In the future I don’t think we will post these coin deals, I don’t feel comfortable knowing that readers will renege on their side of the deal (and let’s be honest what coin purchase would want to offer a guaranteed deal to our readership again) if it becomes more profitable to do so.

286 Comments
newest
oldest most voted

Andy
Andy (@guest_845670)
November 19, 2019 04:41

“PFS NEVER went and negotiated with our members, hey, cancel your order…”

Actually, they did this in September 2016 for the Standing Liberty gold coin, asking their buyers to cancel their orders if they had not yet received delivery. I believe everyone was made whole in the end, for what it’s worth, but not after causing a lot of agony and stress in the meantime. And I’m sure that was a business decision to salvage their reputation — not out of the kindness of their hearts. These guys are not the beacons of morality they claim to be.

think again
think again (@guest_845650)
November 19, 2019 04:03

Full disclosure: I wasn’t able to get the coin, but let’s be clear here:
1. It was an opt-in, but a legally binding contract.
2. PFS holds no downside risk; if you get the coin, send it to them. If not, you lose 20 mins without compensation. There is no “skin in the game” on their end.
3. A day prior, I was offered $280 and told PFS to which they did not honor; only a bump to $250 so they can make the extra $30. Oh the greed (and the irony)…
4. PFS rigged the system of one purchase per household, ridding casual collectors who play by the rule an opportunity to purchase one.
5. PFS operates in disguise. No privacy policy. No business contact. No address. Even the website copyright is still in year 2016. If PFS is upstanding with their practices, why not be fully licensed, registered and transparent? They know their rigging system is not morally and lawfully right.
6. Fulfilling the opt-in is not without significant risk. With point #5 and point #1 in mind, there is no guarantee that one will receive payment. If PFS refuses, the lack of business information (point #5) and a legally binding contract (point #1; yet they remain predatory) protect them. Past performance is not indicative of future performance, especially given their lack of business transparency.

AceTen
AceTen (@guest_845649)
November 19, 2019 03:48

Good. Please do not post the coin deals! I am a 10 year+ member of the mint, an actual collector, but I could not get a coin, even being online exactly at 12 because of all the coin buyer programs.

hupudalao
hupudalao (@guest_845647)
November 19, 2019 03:27

As I watched the heated debate on the sideline, I would just keep this coin in my pocket for a while. I feel bad let PSF take such huge profit, since so many people criticize PSF greedy business model. Also being a good guy I am not mentally ready for take that money myself as of now.

This coin, for me, is more than a coin, it added additional value with this particular social media event, a memory that DOC tries expanding its business model beyond bank points to other profit taken activity among controversial debate. You guys keep debating, maybe involve TPG, CNBC SELECT. But at the end of day, I will keep the coin myself with my respect/appreciation to DOC. But definitely love to see its value increase on ebay.

S shyne
S shyne (@guest_845640)
November 19, 2019 02:45

Its ridiculous. They were always taking more than 20% every other buying group was paying out $270. That’s a whole lot more than pfs .You really think they’re just selling for 350? They were always gonna make a fortune off you and they knew it

churnchurnchurning
churnchurnchurning (@guest_845638)
November 19, 2019 02:27

No respect for PFS. They were literally the lowest lowball offer on this particular coin issue. I can’t understate just how massively PFS has benefited from being the sole buyer broadcast to all of DoC’s followers who know nothing about coins and wanted to make a buck. Did PFS pay for this kind of privilege? Because I sure as hell would have. They got so much value in exposure here.

If PFS’s business cannot survive this, PFS is not in the right business. Every other coin dealer that locked people in with pre-sale offers is doing just fine. The fact that PFS would write this sob story is embarrassing. In all my research on this issue I could not find anyone offering less money than PFS. PFS deserved this. Pre-selling a limited inventory before you have it that is dependent on other people (on multiple levels – they have to a. get the coin and b. follow through on the lowball deal) is a huge risk – they got burned this time. Boo hoo.

If PFS wants people to follow through on the deal, they should offer a price that is at least remotely fair.

Personally, I don’t think DOC should be posting these mint deals. Or if DOC wants to post these deals, post them from someone who is a little more honorable than PFS. But I personally think they shouldn’t be here at all.

TooBusy
TooBusy (@guest_845634)
November 19, 2019 01:58

I’m shipping my coin to PFS tomorrow. Lost in all the legal arguments are the concepts of ethics and collaboration. Without DOC/William Charles and PFS I would be getting exactly $0.00 .

I’m just disappointed that William will not be getting the $20. He more than deserves it.

M44
M44 (@guest_845633)
November 19, 2019 01:56

I happened to have an old ebay account with good feedback, and my coin sold for $800 within a few minutes of listing it. With all fees and shipping, I will net about $680. I think $480 is just too much of a difference. I am sure a lot of people wouldn’t bother with ebay if the difference was smaller, say about $100-200, but almost $500 more than what PFS would have paid is just too much, as people signed up for the PFS deal to make money in the first place.

jack3k3k3k
jack3k3k3k (@guest_845632)
November 19, 2019 01:50

my 2 cents: PFS’s business model exposes them to virtually unlimited risk. They pre-sell their coins – meaning if prices sky rocket, they’re on the hook to deliver – even if that means going out and buying a coin on the open market if they didn’t get enough (much like shorting – unlimited risk as the price goes to infinity – though i’m assuming they can’t cancel their pre-orders which is probably false).

Now consider, as the price rises, two things happen: 1) PFS makes more money on each coin while 2) the number of people breaking their deal with PFS increases. Pretty obvious that with this particular coin, 2 was almost surely the dominant factor here. So you have to wonder, okay, when does PFS make money? We know they lose it when the price sky rockets, they also lose it if the price plummets as they overpay users for a worthless coin. So instead, they’re making a bet that the market value of a coin is in a sweet spot just above what it sold for at the US mint – not too high and not too low.

Personally, this seems reckless, but I guess its working for them. In the end though, I think it’s pretty obvious that they’re doing a speculative gamble and I would hope they are very aware of these risks. I also think they should be aware complaining about the behavior of a large group is not really going to do anything – people are going to behave like this in any other scenario, and it’s kinda important to understand you’re not changing human nature. I mean take for example the price skyrockets to a million bucks, does anyone actually expect users to follow through on selling it to PFS for a paltry $300 bucks? Of course not – its a probabilistic relationship that captures the tradeoffs of selling to PFS and taking larger and larger gains directly on the market.

Curmudgeon
Curmudgeon (@guest_845672)
November 19, 2019 04:45

Things you “know” to be true and things that are actually true are likely not the same thing. Unless you are part of PFS you don’t really know if they lose money if the coin value goes up. I’d suggest they don’t.

Since we’re throwing around wild conjecture as “fact”, here’s mine: PFS likely has an agreement in place with larger wholesalers or coin dealers to provide up to X number of coins at a preset price. If they can’t get X, then they deliver what they can get. They then turn around and offer a smaller premium to individuals to bring the coins in.

I didn’t sign up to deliver my coin to PFS on this deal so I don’t feel bad about keeping mine, but it’s interesting to see how much people are willing to sell their integrity for over this deal.

Will PFS sue you to force the sale or recoup lost profits? No way – it’s just not cost effective, but they probably will (and ought to) blacklist those who backed out as being unreliable or fickle.

Jay
Jay (@guest_845626)
November 19, 2019 01:30

I signed up at PFS. I overslept by a few minutes (9am ftl 🙁 , mad at myself for missed opportunity for sure)

My opinion on this matter:

While I understand Doc’s point of view, I also think the other side has posted some valid arguments. Mainly…
PFS actively encouraged (and gave detailed instructions, see multi-accounting) on how to cheat the US Mint regulations
and
PFS was not fair and transparent when it came to matching offers, as well as overall looking greedy.

But, worst for me, it looks like you seem to have no recourse with PFS eventually scamming you. Everything is set up in secret, no real contracts exist, and so on… (IRS related?).

While this is obv not much of a factor on a small investment like in this case, it does kinda remind me of the giftcard re-selling fiasco a while back (see e.g. The Plastic Merchant).
Nice guy gets in over his head at some point and just uses a simple exit stategy on a high value coin and disappears.

Having said that, I think I’m actually fine with DoC stopping to advertise those reselling deals, even if it’s for different reason (= risk of getting scammed) then he is implying here (= his untrustworthy and reneging readership)…

think again
think again (@guest_845653)
November 19, 2019 04:07

DoC’s decision to stop advertising PFS is more of a protection on DoC’s end because if PFS is exposed of their fraudulent practices, DoC will be next in line of fire.