October 1st EMV Chip Liability Shift Explained & How It Affects Consumers

We’ve made reference to the October EMV chip liability shift in the past many times. Yesterday reader, JB alerted me to the fact that I’ve never really discussed what this liability shift is, why it’s happening and how it effects consumers. I thought now would be a pretty good time to do so.

What Is An EMV Chip?

Chances are you already have at least one credit card that has an EMV chip in it. EMV stands for Europay, MasterCard and Visa. The chips look like this:

emv chip

EMV chips and EMV chip readers will eventually replace magnetic stripes and magnetic stripe readers and the main reason for this is because EMV chips have increased security which makes it much more difficult for fraudsters to replicate.

Each EMV chip contains a tiny microprocessor that encrypts credit card transaction data, it also communicates with EMV chip card readers to confirm that the card is authentic. These are incredibly difficult to replicate, which is why countries that have seen EMV chip adoption have also seen a decrease in the rate of fraud in card present transactions.

Less fraud is good for everybody. Consumers are covered by zero fraud liability guarantees (mean they are not liable for any fraudulent use of their credit cards), but they still need to dispute fraudulent transactions which can be incredibly time consuming. Merchants can be held liable for these fraudulent purchases and dealing with fraudulent purchases is extremely costly to the payment networks.

What Is The October Liability Shift?

You would think that because changing to EMV chip technology is beneficial to everybody that this would be a relatively easy change. Unfortunately this is not the case, a lot of this has to do with the size of the U.S market:

Because adoption has been slow, Visa, Mastercard, American Express & Discover have decided to institute a liability shift to help speed up the process (you can read Visa’s official statement here). These following changes will come into effect on October 1st, 2015:

the party that is the cause of a chip-on-chip transaction not occurring (i.e., either the issuer or the merchant’s acquirer) will be financially liable for any resulting card-present counterfeit fraud
losses. – Visa

This is really more wordy than it needs to be, they are really just saying that whoever has the lesser technology will be liable for fraud. Let’s have a look at a couple of examples:

  1. Donald has a Discover it Miles credit card with an EMV chip. The card is stolen and is used at a grocery store that has payment terminals that do not accept EMV chips. In this case the grocery store would be liable for that fraud.
  2. Julie has a Barclaycard Sallie Mae credit card without an EMV chip. The card is stolen and is used at a grocery store that has a payment terminal that does accept EMV chips. In this case Barclaycard would be liable for that fraud.

In cases where they both have the same technology (e.g EMV & EMV or only magnetic strip and magnetic strip) the fraud will result in the normal rules that Visa & MasterCard have set out.

There are a couple of transactions this liability shift does not affect and that is pay at the pump purchases (this will come into affect October 1st, 2017 for most of the payment networks) and ATM transactions (MasterCard is set make this liability shift October 1st, 2016).

How Will This Affect Consumers?

The most important thing to remember is that your liability isn’t changing at all, you will still have zero fraud liability on your credit cards. The big difference is that more merchants will have EMV compatible card readers and more card issuers will be issuing (or reissuing) credit cards that come with an EMV chip to reduce their own liability.

Unfortunately this does not mean that EMV chip + PIN (which has even less chance of fraud occuring due to the 1:10,000 chance that somebody could guess your PIN) will become standard, but it’s a step in the right direction and should make travelling internationally much easier.

Additional Reading/Resources

 

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

6 Comments
newest
oldest most voted

JT
JT (@guest_86156)
March 9, 2015 19:12

Although I’m pleased that EMV cards have finally started to be issued in the US, I’m dismayed that most US card issuers designate them as Chip and Signature by default, with Chip and PIN as secondary. It seems to me that this defeats the purpose of the safety aspects of the technology — how many merchants actually compare the signature on the card with the signature on the receipt? And am I the only one somewhat annoyed when a clerk asks for ID?. Plus, it’s sure awkward when in Europe untrained store clerks get a Chip and Signature card, and the clerk is not familiar with how to run it since European cards default to PIN.

Are you listening, Barclaycard Arrival?

scwam
scwam (@guest_1050093)
September 7, 2020 13:18
  JT

Here in Japan, the default is without pin on with chip cards. I’ve never been prompted to enter a pin.

frozy
frozy (@guest_84267)
March 4, 2015 12:33

Excuse my ignorance but how does EMV prevent fraud? If I understand correctly, all EMV cards also have magnetic strips, and all terminals accept magnetic swipe – even the EMV enabled. So why can’t a fraudster just replicate your strip?

Russ
Russ (@guest_112390)
May 1, 2015 16:14

Tried it out today with a cashier friend – we swiped an EMV card in an EMV-enabled reader, the terminal refused to process it with an error that told her to stick in the chip.

Obviously something on the mag stripe tells the terminal it is an EMV card and their terminal was set to refuse swiping of EMV cards.

Perhaps fraudsters will find a way to undo either of those, only time will tell.