Recap: Japan Bans 70+ Countries, U.S. Hotels Say That $2 Trillion Relief Package Not Enough & More

 

Deals starting/expiring at the end of today or starting today (view the full deal calendar here):

Deals starting/expiring at end of tomorrow:

Popular posts from yesterday:

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

24 Comments
newest
oldest most voted

bax
bax (@guest_951175)
April 3, 2020 14:41

The travel ban does not affect transit passengers going through Japan (without leaving the airport terminal, I assume) on their way to another country, if the Japan Visitor Hotline operated by Japan National Tourism Organization (JNTO) at +81-50-3816-2787 understood me correctly. So one can still transit through a Japanese airport from one of the 70+ countries on the list.

Simple
Simple (@guest_950652)
April 2, 2020 17:34

Legitimate question as I’m clueless. How come these hotels don’t have a 6-12 month emergency fund?

A M
A M (@guest_951132)
April 3, 2020 13:16

Because they’re high on debt and want to pay their execs more and do stock buybacks to that end and also to reward investors. They’re irresponsible, in short. Sure, they may invest some in their own properties or something. But that’s no excuse. Do we have the same attitude toward individuals investing in their education? Heck no. They never get bailed out — they take their debt to the grave.

Judy Ford
Judy Ford (@guest_950546)
April 2, 2020 14:53

Can you be born to African parents in Japan n at the same time be a Japan citizen? Serious question. Japan not friendly country. Remember Genghis Khan. Japan Warrior.

JT
JT (@guest_950610)
April 2, 2020 16:25

Ah, I think you may want to dial your Almond Joy a bit more back to Mounds, ya nut.

GengisKhan
GengisKhan (@guest_950633)
April 2, 2020 16:57

Wait don’t bring me into this.

slowbrake
slowbrake (@guest_950634)
April 2, 2020 16:58

The Mongols tried 2 times to invade Japan and were wiped out by storms the first time and the kamikaze the second. It’s a cool history story.

and to be helpful, answers can be found in wikipedia under the answer “Japanese nationality law”

A M
A M (@guest_950437)
April 2, 2020 12:31

Businesses that didn’t save and budget and spent on stock buybacks should go under, as should those who provided inferior service. The jobs lost from one hotel chain will go to another, better, hotel chain, eventually. That’s the free market. “Dynamism.”

But no, if there’s anything we’ve learned from this, it’s that industry (not small businesses) are parasites and takers. Socialized losses, privatized gains. We bail them out. They keep the money. Every. Single. Time.

GengisKhan
GengisKhan (@guest_950478)
April 2, 2020 13:18

I never really understood why stock buybacks were so popular. I understand the theory they they cause the stock price to rise and that capital gains are better than dividends in that they are taxed more favorably (which should end – IMO) but at least when you get the dividend you now have something tangible that you can use. I bet all the cheerleaders for stock buybacks are kicking themselves now and wishing that they had received dividends – instead of temporary stock gains that have just evaporated.

atexit8
atexit8 (@guest_950481)
April 2, 2020 13:24

Buybacks raise stock prices on which executive compensation is based.

The theory was that if companies did well then the executives pay would be according.

atexit8
atexit8 (@guest_950483)
April 2, 2020 13:26

socialized losses + privatized gains = USA economics

apparently socialism is good when it benefits corporations

.

PoorChurner
PoorChurner (@guest_950370)
April 2, 2020 10:55

No refund yet for my Japan ANA ticket in May. Only flights up to April 30.

debit
debit (@guest_950337)
April 2, 2020 10:12

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/02/opinion/coronavirus-men-women.html

Tbis eye opening. I think once this is over we need to discuss the gender quality and what we can do to protect men. We talk too much about women

qmc
qmc (@guest_950453)
April 2, 2020 12:47

“Most attempts to explain this discrepancy have focused primarily on behavior, some of which are almost certainly valid. Higher rates of tobacco consumption, a reluctance to seek proper and timely medical care and even lower rates of hand-washing absolutely do play a role in who will be hit hardest.”

Sounds like we can start by making ’em change their behaviors to act more like women

“And our sex chromosomes by and large determine our sex hormones — which also give her an advantage: Higher levels of testosterone appear to suppress the immune system; conversely, estrogens have been found to stimulate a more vigorous immunological response.”

and try giving them doses of estrogen.

Are you going to volunteer for these studies?

“The current practice of medicine was built using research that was done primarily on male cells, male tissues, male organs, male animals and male test subjects. As a result, we tend to know more about men when it comes to the determinants of health and well-being. With a few exceptions, such as gynecological and obstetric issues, we tend to clinically treat women just like we treat men. As a result, our comprehension of the staggering medical impact stemming from the differences between the sexes is only in its infancy.
But the understanding of these differences has the potential to fill in the gaps of knowledge that have kept us from making medical breakthroughs. Our male-centric, one-size-fits-all model of health care and the research culture that stems from it need to change.”

We should study men more! … wait, this suggests the opposite?!

GengisKhan
GengisKhan (@guest_950472)
April 2, 2020 13:07

If it scares you so much I understand there is an operation that you can have.

SamL
SamL (@guest_950517)
April 2, 2020 14:13

No there isn’t.

Judy Ford
Judy Ford (@guest_950544)
April 2, 2020 14:50

In part women caused this. Can u say Angela Merkel….lol. Won’t fo the right thing , it’s her compass ion that’s killing Wermany.

Frank
Frank (@guest_950323)
April 2, 2020 09:44

FYI total US personal income tax is $1.9tn and the 1% paid 37% of that. You could have eliminated income tax on 99% of the population AND given everyone a check for $3,000 AND saved money off the $2.2tn bailout (yes, it was a $2.2tn bailout, the news rounded off $200bn)

But instead we gave billions to corporations. We also gave $75m to the JFK museum who promptly laid off their whole workforce and then gave $5m to the DNC

But yeah, screw those millennials for wanting help with loans

GengisKhan
GengisKhan (@guest_950331)
April 2, 2020 09:57

Think it was $25 million actually not $75 million.

atexit8
atexit8 (@guest_950340)
April 2, 2020 10:14

That’s how trickle-down works.

Government trusts multi-billion corporations more than the average person.

.

Kyle
Kyle (@guest_950353)
April 2, 2020 10:41

Any source for the $5m donation?

JT
JT (@guest_950368)
April 2, 2020 10:53

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/kennedy-center-donate-dnc/

Standard pot stirring MAGA conspiracy theory from one of his twitter cheerleaders.

Derek
Derek (@guest_950369)
April 2, 2020 10:55

It wasn’t the JFK Museum, it was the Kennedy Center in DC. From Snopes:

“Furthermore, the Center did indeed furlough workers, including orchestral musicians, even after learning it would receive $25 million from the U.S. Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act that President Donald Trump signed into law on March 27, 2020. However, the Center, which is a 501(c)3 non-profit organization, did not then donate $5 million of relief funds to the Democratic National Committee (DNC). Under U.S. tax law, 501(c)3 organizations are legally prohibited from making political contributions. A spokeswoman for the Center confirmed to us that the organization made no contribution to the DNC and said the Center “has never donated money to a political organization.”

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/kennedy-center-donate-dnc/

G
G (@guest_950303)
April 2, 2020 09:16

Who gets enough?